Which approach is best for summarizing arguments in extemporaneous writing?

In extemporaneous writing, summarizing arguments effectively requires a focus on clarity and conciseness. Highlighting key points succinctly allows the reader to grasp the main ideas quickly and understand the overall argument without being overwhelmed by excessive detail. This approach is particularly valuable in contexts where time is limited, and the writer must convey their understanding and perspective swiftly.

Emphasizing brevity ensures that the core message is delivered clearly, making it easier for the audience to follow the writer's line of reasoning. Additionally, by focusing on essential points, the writer can facilitate a more engaging and impactful communication of ideas. This method fosters a strong connection with the audience, enabling them to retain significant information without getting bogged down in elaboration that can detract from the central message.

In contrast, elaborating extensively, relying solely on personal anecdotes, or avoiding summarization altogether may dilute the effectiveness of the writing, making it challenging for the audience to engage with or remember the main arguments presented.